> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.snowdoughnut.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Copy brief

> A fill-in workbook for a single piece of copy on any channel: email, SMS, paid social, search, or elsewhere. Links to the campaign brief, creative brief, and customer profile behind it, and to the channel template it hands off to.

*This page is a workbook. Fill in each section, and open a section's "Concept review" dropdown if you want the thinking behind it before you answer. You can complete the whole brief without opening one.*

*Grayed* `E.g. ` *text is an example to delete. Every example on this page uses one invented company, Doughnut Labs, a SaaS business that sells disruptive Doughnut Technology, so you can see one brief taking shape rather than scattered fragments.*

<Note>
  Fill in the required core first. Add the optional sections only where they'd change what gets written. Link brand and campaign documents in Part 3 instead of retyping them here.
</Note>

<Steps>
  <Step title="Fill in the required core">
    Objective, customer profile, message, voice and mandatories, channels, and success criteria.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Add the optional sections that apply">
    Hook direction, objections, and localization only earn a place when they'd change what gets written.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Link supporting material and file finished copy">
    Point to the brand and channel documents the writer needs, then link each piece of finished copy as it's approved.
  </Step>
</Steps>

## Setup

| Field                                                                 | Fill in                                              |
| :-------------------------------------------------------------------- | :--------------------------------------------------- |
| [Owner](/glossary#owner)                                              | *E.g. Aisha Bello*                                   |
| Writer                                                                | *E.g. Jordan Bell*                                   |
| Copy brief name ([file naming conventions](/file-naming-conventions)) | *E.g.* `COPY_q3-trial-push_2027-08-20_v01`           |
| [Marketing campaign brief](/marketing-campaign-brief)                 | *E.g. Doughnut Labs "Fresh Batch" spring trial push* |
| [Creative brief](/creative-brief)(s)                                  | *E.g. link to the paid social creative brief*        |
| \[add setup field]                                                    |                                                      |

<Accordion title="Concept review: Setup fields">
  The owner is accountable for this piece of copy end to end; the writer is whoever's drafting it, and on a small team those can be the same person. Keeping the fields separate matters once they're not.

  The campaign and creative brief links are what keep this piece of copy from reading as a standalone document. They place it inside the job it's actually part of, so a reader can trace it back to the strategy and the visual direction it has to sit alongside.
</Accordion>

## 1. Objective and reader action

**Fill in all three so a business number never lands on a writer's desk as if it were direction:**

| Level                   | Fill in                                                                           |
| :---------------------- | :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Business goal           | *E.g. Grow self-serve trial signups 20% this quarter.*                            |
| Communication objective | *E.g. Make setup feel fast and low-risk to someone who's never used the product.* |
| Reader action           | *E.g. Reads the email and starts a trial.*                                        |

<Accordion title="Concept review: Objective and reader action">
  The business goal is the commercial result. The communication objective is what this specific piece of copy has to change in the reader's head. The reader action is the concrete thing you want them to do once they've read, watched, or heard it.

  Collapsing these into one line usually loses the part a writer can act on. "Increase trials" doesn't tell anyone what to write; "reads the subject line and opens the email" does.
</Accordion>

## 2. Customer profile and insight

**Link the [customer profile](/customer-profile-library-overview) this copy speaks to, and name the one thing about how they think that should steer the writing:**

| Customer profile                                    | Link        | Insight this copy pushes against                                                                                                                        |
| :-------------------------------------------------- | :---------- | :------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| *E.g. Solo founders evaluating Doughnut Technology* | *E.g. link* | *E.g. They've been burned by tools that promised "easy" and then needed a week of onboarding, so they discount a speed claim until they see it happen.* |
| \[add profile]                                      |             |                                                                                                                                                         |

<Accordion title="Concept review: Customer profile and insight">
  Pulling the profile from the shared library, instead of redescribing it here, keeps this brief consistent with every other piece of copy written for the same person.

  The insight is what turns a job title or age range into something a writer can push against. Knowing someone's role tells you where to run the ad; knowing what they currently believe tells you what the first sentence has to overcome.
</Accordion>

## 3. Key message and proof

**State the one idea the reader should take away, and the reasons they should believe it:**

**Core message:** *E.g. Doughnut Labs gets you live in a day, not a quarter, and you can prove it before you pay a cent.*

**Supporting proof:**

* *E.g. Guided 4-step setup, no sales call required*
* *E.g. Median time-to-first-ship under 3 hours*
* *E.g. 2,000+ teams live*
* \[add proof point]

<Accordion title="Concept review: Key message and proof">
  This message should come from the campaign brief's messaging, not get reinvented for this one piece. When two assets in the same campaign carry two different "most important" messages, the campaign stops reading like one campaign.

  Proof is what makes the message credible instead of just asserted. A number, a specific mechanism, a demonstration, or a customer's own words all do more work than an adjective.
</Accordion>

## 4. Voice, tone, and mandatories

**Link the [brand voice and tone](/brand-voice-and-tone) workbook and note the part that applies to this piece, rather than describing the voice again here:**

| Document             | Link        | What applies here                   |
| :------------------- | :---------- | :---------------------------------- |
| Brand voice and tone | *E.g. link* | *E.g. Section 4, pricing-page tone* |

**Must include:**

* *E.g. "Start free trial" CTA, exact wording*
* *E.g. Required legal line on the pricing claim*
* \[add requirement]

**Must not include:**

* *E.g. "Instant" or "zero effort" claims we can't support*
* *E.g. Competitor names*
* \[add restriction]

**Elements that must appear in every serve, and how that is guaranteed:**

| Element                   | Why it's required                                                                 | How it's guaranteed                                              |
| :------------------------ | :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | :--------------------------------------------------------------- |
| *E.g. "No card required"* | *E.g. Condition on the trial claim, [legal review](/legal-review-process) 12 Apr* | *E.g. Pinned to headline position 1 in the responsive search ad* |
| \[add element]            |                                                                                   |                                                                  |

<Warning>
  Formats that assemble their own combinations, responsive search ads and Performance Max among them, can leave any individual asset out of a given serve. A required line listed under "must include" is not actually guaranteed unless the third column says how. See [conditions have to survive the format](/legal-review-process#conditions-have-to-survive-the-format).
</Warning>

<Accordion title="Concept review: Voice, tone, and mandatories">
  Voice and tone rules live in one place, the linked workbook, so a writer isn't working from a version that's quietly drifted from the source. This section's job is only to point at the part of that document that matters for this piece.

  Splitting mandatories into what must appear and what must never appear does the same thing for requirements that voice does for tone: it separates what's fixed from what's a style choice, so a required legal line never gets treated as negotiable just because it's sitting next to a preference.

  The third column exists because "must include" quietly stopped meaning what it used to. In a fixed-layout ad, writing a line into the brief put it on the page. In a format that mixes assets per auction, it only puts the line in the pool that might be shown. The mechanism that closes that gap differs by format, and naming it here is what stops an approved condition from being met on paper and missed in the ad.
</Accordion>

## 5. Channels and deliverables

**List every channel this copy has to run on. Each one hands off to its own template, which is where the character limits and field structure live:**

| Channel        | Format                  | Copy template                                                | Deadline      |
| :------------- | :---------------------- | :----------------------------------------------------------- | :------------ |
| *E.g. Email*   | *E.g. Promotional send* | *E.g.* [Email copy template](/email-copy-template)           | *E.g. Aug 18* |
| *E.g. Meta*    | *E.g. Single image*     | *E.g.* [Meta static/video](/meta-static-video-copy-template) | *E.g. Aug 20* |
| \[add channel] |                         |                                                              |               |

<Accordion title="Concept review: Channels and deliverables">
  The same message needs a different shape on every channel: a different length, a different structure, a different idea of what counts as the call to action. Listing every channel this copy runs on is what stops a version written for one from getting reused unchanged on another.

  This table doesn't repeat each channel's character limits, since the linked template already carries them and a second copy would just be one more place for the numbers to go stale. Its job is only to say which channels apply and route the writer to the right starting point.
</Accordion>

## 6. Success criteria

**Define both. Fill the type that applies:**

**Copy acceptance (is the writing itself right?):**

* *E.g. Uses the approved CTA wording exactly*
* *E.g. Fits every channel's character limits*
* *E.g. Matches brand voice section 4*
* \[add criterion]

**Campaign performance (did it do its job?):**

* *E.g. Email click-through above 3%*
* *E.g. Meta CTR above 1.2%*
* \[add metric]

<Accordion title="Concept review: Success criteria">
  Copy acceptance asks whether the writing is right on its own terms: on-brand, within limits, carrying the required elements. Campaign performance asks whether it moved a number once it ran.

  Both belong here even if the writer isn't accountable for the performance number, because knowing what's being measured changes what gets written. A writer who knows click-through is the bar will write a different subject line than one who was only told to sound on-brand.
</Accordion>

## Part 2: Optional sections

<Tip>
  Add a section here only when it would change what gets written. A section that wouldn't change a word adds length without direction.
</Tip>

### Hook and opening line direction

<Tip>
  Optional: include when the reader's attention has to be earned before anything else gets read, such as a paid social ad, an email subject line, or the first seconds of a video script.
</Tip>

**What should the first line, subject, or opening moment do?**

*E.g. Open with the specific objection ("Setup looks like it'll eat a week") rather than opening with the product name.*

<Accordion title="Concept review: Hook and opening line direction">
  A hook is judged by whether it earns the next line, not by whether it's clever on its own. Naming the job it should do (open a curiosity gap, name a pain point, state a specific promise) gives a writer something more precise to aim at than "make it punchy."

  What earns attention varies by channel and by reader. A cold paid-social scroll and a subject line in an inbox someone already trusts are different problems, which is why this section exists separately from the channel table above rather than being folded into it.
</Accordion>

### Objections the copy must answer

<Tip>
  Optional: include when the reader is likely to hesitate before taking the action named in section 1.
</Tip>

**What might make the reader hesitate, and how does the copy answer it?**

| Objection                                  | How the copy answers it                                    |
| :----------------------------------------- | :--------------------------------------------------------- |
| *E.g. "Is my data safe during the trial?"* | *E.g. SOC 2 badge and a one-line data policy near the CTA* |
| \[add row]                                 |                                                            |

<Accordion title="Concept review: Objections the copy must answer">
  Listing the doubt next to its answer turns a vague instruction like "make it persuasive" into work a writer can actually do. Which objections matter depends on the reader and the channel: a warm email list and a cold search ad usually carry different doubts.

  Not every piece of copy needs this section. A short brand-awareness line with no direct ask may not be answering an objection at all.
</Accordion>

### Localization and reading level

<Tip>
  Optional: include when the copy runs across regions, languages, or needs to hold to a specific reading level.
</Tip>

**What localization or reading-level requirements apply?**

*E.g. Localize for UK and Canada. Allow roughly 30% text expansion for the German version. Keep support-adjacent copy around a grade 6 reading level.*

<Accordion title="Concept review: Localization and reading level">
  A character limit that fits comfortably in English can overflow once a line is translated, and a headline that reads clearly at one reading level can lose part of its audience at another. Naming these requirements before drafting starts lets a writer build around them instead of cutting a translated line down after the fact.

  This matters most for copy that's public-facing or reaches a broad or international reader. A single internal email to an English-speaking team may not need this section at all.
</Accordion>

## Part 3: Supporting material and brand links

<Note>
  Link out to your brand system and channel templates here instead of retyping them. Fill in a link for every document the writer needs, and mark any that don't apply.
</Note>

**Brand system links:**

| Document             | Link        | Notes for this brief                                              |
| :------------------- | :---------- | :---------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Brand voice and tone | *E.g. link* | *E.g. Section 4 covers the pricing-page tone this copy follows*   |
| Messaging            | *E.g. link* | *E.g. Pull the approved "live in a day" line, don't rewrite it*   |
| Positioning          | *E.g. link* | *E.g. "Fastest to first ship" is the pillar this copy ladders to* |
| Brand assets         | *E.g. link* | *E.g. Approved product screenshots for any linked visuals*        |
| Approved claims list | *E.g. link* | *E.g. Anything not on this list needs legal sign-off*             |
| \[add document]      |             |                                                                   |

**Channel copy templates:**

* Email: [Email copy template](/email-copy-template)
* Meta: [Static/video](/meta-static-video-copy-template), [Carousel](/meta-carousel-copy-template), [Collection](/meta-collection-copy-template), [Lead ad](/meta-lead-ad-copy-template)
* Google: [Search](/google-search-copy-template), [Display](/google-display-copy-template), [Performance Max](/google-pmax-copy-template), [Demand Gen](/google-demand-gen-copy-template), [YouTube](/google-youtube-copy-template), [App campaign](/google-app-campaign-copy-template)
* LinkedIn: [Single image](/linkedin-single-image-copy-template), [Video](/linkedin-video-copy-template), [Carousel](/linkedin-carousel-copy-template), [Document](/linkedin-document-copy-template), [Message ad](/linkedin-message-ad-copy-template), [Conversation ad](/linkedin-conversation-ad-copy-template), [Text ad](/linkedin-text-ad-copy-template), [Follower ad](/linkedin-follower-ad-copy-template)
* TikTok: [In-feed](/tiktok-in-feed-copy-template), [Spark ad](/tiktok-spark-ad-copy-template), [Carousel](/tiktok-carousel-copy-template), [Video shopping](/tiktok-video-shopping-copy-template), [TopView](/tiktok-topview-copy-template)
* \[add channel template], for channels like SMS that don't have one yet. Note who owns creating it.

<Accordion title="Concept review: Supporting material and brand links">
  The brand system (voice, messaging, positioning, assets, approved claims) is stable and shared across every piece of copy anyone writes. Retyping any of it into an individual brief creates a second version that can drift from the source, so this section links to it instead.

  The channel templates are where the actual deliverable gets built once this brief is set: the specific fields, character limits, and format for each platform. This brief hands off to them; it doesn't duplicate what's already defined there.
</Accordion>

## Finished copy

**Link the approved, final copy for each channel as it lands. This fills in while the work happens, not at planning time:**

| Channel    | Link |
| :--------- | :--- |
| \[add row] |      |

<Accordion title="Concept review: Finished copy">
  This is where the approved version of each channel's copy ends up, separate from the brief that specified it, so anyone looking for the current version can find it without digging through drafts.

  An empty row here on copy that's supposedly already running is a signal worth chasing down, not a paperwork gap to ignore.
</Accordion>

## Build order recap

<Steps>
  <Step title="Core is complete">
    Objective, customer profile and insight, message and proof, voice and mandatories, channels, and success criteria are filled in.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Only relevant optional sections are included">
    Hook direction, objections, and localization each earn their place by changing what gets written.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Brand system and templates are linked, not retyped">
    Part 3 links every document the writer needs, and the channel table routes to the right template for each format.
  </Step>
</Steps>

## Related resources

* [**Copy brief concepts**](/copy-brief-concepts) The thinking behind each section: how a copy brief differs from a creative brief, and why each field exists.
* [**Copywriting process**](/copywriting-process) How a copy brief moves from assignment to approved, finished copy.
* [**Copy brief library**](/copy-brief-library) Where completed briefs are filed.
* [**Copy drive**](/copy-drive) Where approved copy is filed. Search it before writing something new.
* [**Customer profile library**](/customer-profile-library-overview)
* [**Marketing campaign brief**](/marketing-campaign-brief) and [**creative brief**](/creative-brief)
* [**Brand voice and tone**](/brand-voice-and-tone)
